The alternative to Zyght with comprehensive EHSQ + ESG, real AI, and certified security

When an organization starts looking for an alternative to Zyght, it doesn’t always mean it’s been using the platform for years. Sometimes they’re in the middle of evaluating the market: they have an Excel spreadsheet that’s reached its limits, or a legacy system that doesn’t scale, and Zyght appears on the shortlist alongside other options. In both cases, the question is the same: what does each platform offer beyond digitizing field records?

Zyght deserves recognition for what it does well. It is an HSE-focused operational tool with a strong presence in Chile and Spain, particularly in industrial sectors where on-site risk management is critical. Its adoption in the Chilean market is no coincidence: it is a platform that understands that context, has strong local references, and features an interface designed for fieldwork.

The shift in the conversation occurs when three needs arise that Zyght is not designed to address. The first is having Quality on the same platform as Safety and Environment—not in a parallel system with its own Excel spreadsheet for nonconformities. Second, having AI that analyzes and prioritizes data coming in from the field, not just records it. And the third is an issue that has rapidly gained prominence in procurement committees: Where is my data, and what certifications guarantee its security? In an environment where several platforms in the industry have suffered cybersecurity incidents, that question is no longer just a formality.

“At Zelestra, thanks to Prodity, we are making progress in the digitization and efficient, customized management of our QHSE system. We especially appreciate the quality of their customer service and their ability to adapt to our needs, which makes them an excellent partner and provider of SaaS solutions.”

Laura Rodríguez González, Senior H&S Manager — Zelestra

Why are companies looking for an alternative to Zyght?

Almost no one abandons Zyght—or rules it out during an evaluation—because of a basic usability issue. The decision to switch is driven by four specific patterns that emerge when the organization scales or when strategic requirements exceed the tool’s original scope.

• The reliability of the data is in doubt. Several users report inconsistencies between what the dashboards show and operational reality: metrics that don’t add up, records that don’t appear where they should, or figures that vary from session to session for no apparent reason. When a safety technician stops trusting the numbers they see on the screen, the system ceases to be a decision-making tool and becomes a source of noise. EHSQ software that breeds distrust in its own data is, in practice, worse than having no software at all.
• There is no native AI that processes your data. Zyght offers customizable dashboards and reports, but the analysis is performed by the technician. There is no artificial intelligence layer that reads the history of observations, analyzes the quality of the data in the records, or autonomously generates a draft action plan. When the volume of records grows—and in industrial operations it always does—the safety technician spends hours on tasks that AI should be able to complete in minutes.
• Quality does not exist as a module. Zyght covers Safety, Health, and the Environment. Period. If you manage product nonconformities, CAPA, internal quality audits, or need to report in accordance with ISO 9001, you’ll still need a second system. The result is the same as always: two site master records, two personnel databases, and a technician manually cross-referencing data every time an incident has its root cause in a production process or a supplier failure. The boundary between Quality and Safety doesn’t exist in operational reality, but it does exist in the software.

• ESG coverage is partial. Sustainability reporting requirements have changed radically over the past two years, especially for companies operating in European markets. Zyght includes some environmental features, but it is not designed to manage ESG indicators in accordance with frameworks such as GRI, ESRS, or CSRD. For a british or american publicly traded company or one with institutional investors, this becomes a compliance issue that cannot be resolved with a quick fix.
• Data security has become a selection criterion. Until recently, this question rarely came up during the EHSQ software purchasing process: What would happen if the platform suffered a cyberattack? Who would be responsible? And how long would it take? Today, people are asking these questions—and with good reason. Zyght has already had to explain to its clients the availability of its service and the integrity of their data following a security incident. For a company that stores accident records, regulatory audit reports, and occupational health data, a breach isn’t just a technical problem—it has legal and reputational consequences.

Head-to-Head: Prodity vs. Zyght

Reliable data vs. inconsistencies that breed mistrust

• The corporate challenge: Distrust in data isn’t always openly expressed, but it can be detected in behavior: the technician who cross-checks the data in the system against the paper record before presenting it, the manager who asks for confirmation before using a figure in a report. When this happens systematically, the software is no longer a decision-making tool.
• Prodity’s Solution: Prodity operates using a single master database for organization, people, and locations. All modules read from and write to the same database: there are no system synchronizations, and there are no parallel versions of the same records. What you see on the dashboard is exactly what’s there.

Real, actionable AI vs. lack of proprietary AI

• The corporate challenge: The practical consequence of not having native AI isn’t just slowness—it’s that the prevention specialist spends their time sorting, grouping, or exporting data so that another tool can process it, rather than taking action. Analysis becomes the job itself, rather than the starting point.

• Prodity’s Solution: Prodity’s AI suite—AI Scout, RelaTiQ, Action Bot, Smart Play, and FieldVoice—is designed to analyze and classify, not just list. Agents read field reports, detect patterns, group causes, and propose a draft action plan; the decision still rests with the prevention manager, but it is made with more information and is better prepared.
  • AI Scout answers questions about your data in natural language: “Give me the five most common types of incidents at the Santiago plant over the past six months” is a query that can be resolved without having to create a manual report.
  • RelaTiQ analyzes the organization’s history to identify correlations between causes, areas, and types of events.
  • Action Bot generates proposed action plans based on the findings, including the people responsible and suggested deadlines.
  • Smart Play automates intelligent reviews of thousands of records: information quality, PSIF detection, PSO analysis, and more. As a result, Tubacex’s analysis of preventive observations went from 15 hours per month to less than 1.
  • FieldVoice allows field workers to create a record by sending an audio message via WhatsApp. No forms, no screens, no friction.

Scope of EHSQ+ESG vs. HSE Platform

• The Corporate Challenge: Operating with two separate systems is not just an efficiency issue—it’s a traceability issue. When an accident is rooted in a supplier failure or a production process, the investigation crosses the boundary between Safety and Quality. If that boundary exists in the software, some of the information is lost or arrives late.

• Prodity’s Solution: Prodity integrates Quality, Environment, Safety, and ESG into a single ecosystem: 27 modules organized into four dimensions, all based on a single master database for the organization, people, and sites. A quality nonconformity and a workplace accident share the same system for managing action plans, responsible parties, deadlines, and traceability.

Comprehensive ESG coverage vs. partial environmental features

• The corporate challenge: The problem isn’t that Zyght ignores ESG; it’s that it treats it as an extension of environmental issues, when current regulatory frameworks—ESRS, CSRD—require a structured approach that encompasses governance, the value chain, and social metrics. A patch on top of an HSE platform does not bridge that gap.
• How Prodity approaches it: Prodity incorporates ESG management as a native feature. The indicators are captured within the same operational workflow as safety and quality data, and reports are generated in accordance with GRI, ESRS, and CSRD standards. No manual exports, no consolidation in Excel.

Certified security vs. a track record that raises questions

• The corporate challenge: A security incident on an EHSQ platform affects not only service availability but also occupational health data, accident records, and regulatory audit reports. The key question is not whether the provider makes a strong case for cybersecurity, but what certifies that it actually complies.

• Prodity’s Solution: Prodity has a suite of certifications that no other competitor in the cluster can fully replicate:
  • ISO 27001 — Information Security Management, externally audited.
  • ISO 27017 — Security specifically for cloud services, with advanced controls that go beyond the base standard.
  • ISO 9001 — Certified quality in internal development and support processes.
  • ENS Intermediate Level, which allows Prodity to conduct business with public agencies and regulated entities in Spain in accordance with the most stringent security requirements of the European regulatory framework.

Feature	Prodity	Zyght
Data Reliability	✅ Consistent and auditable data	⚠️ Reported inconsistencies
Native Artificial Intelligence	✅ 5 native AI agents	❌ No
Quality Module	✅ Native	❌ Not included
ESG Integration	✅ Native (GRI, ESRS, CSRD)	⚠️ Limited
Certified Security	✅ ISO 27001, 27017, ENS Intermediate Level	⚠️ Documented security incidents

5 Reasons Why Prodity Is the Preferred Software Over Zyght

1. Data You Can Trust: An EHSQ system is only useful if the team trusts what it shows. Prodity operates on a single master database for the organization, people, and facilities: all modules read from and write to the same database, with no need for synchronization between systems or parallel versions of the same records. What you see on the dashboard is what you get—no need to cross-check it with a paper record before taking it to a meeting.
2. Certified data security: ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ENS Medium Level, and ISO 9001. Four independent certifications covering information security, specific protection in cloud environments, the requirements of the Spanish public administration, and the quality of internal processes. In an industry where some competitors have already had to explain themselves to their customers following a security incident, this is a compelling argument for any IT director or risk committee.
3. Adoption in the Field Because It’s Used: Safety software only works if operators use it. FieldVoice lets you create records by sending an audio message via WhatsApp—no screen, no forms, no friction. The mobile app works offline and syncs when coverage is restored. QR codes provide immediate access to safety data sheets and PPE documentation. When reporting is easy, the number of observations and near-misses increases—and with it, the actual ability to prevent incidents.
4. AI that takes action, not just provides information: AI Scout, RelaTiQ, Action Bot, Smart Play, and FieldVoice work with your actual data to analyze, detect patterns, and suggest actions. The most verifiable result: Tubacex reduced the time spent analyzing preventive observations by 93%, going from 15 hours per month to less than 1. The team devoted that time to taking action, not to analysis.
5. Quality and EHS in the Same Workflow: A quality deviation, an environmental nonconformity, and an accident all share the same investigation engine, the same action plan, and the same dashboard. Gone are the days of the monthly exercise of reconciling two systems to present a figure to the management committee.

What Sets Prodity Apart

Everything connected, not in isolation

EHSQ and ESG on the same platform: 27 modules across four dimensions based on a single data model, plus an open API to integrate with the corporate tools you already use—ERP, HR, BI. No need to export to Excel to cross-reference a quality nonconformity with the safety incident that caused it. The simplest question to ask any vendor you’re evaluating: Does it have a native Quality module? The answer determines which category of tool you’re purchasing.

It adapts to your process, not the other way around

No-code drag-and-drop configuration. Start with the 27 standard modules or build your company’s workflow from scratch. Forms, fields, risk scales, approval workflows—the EHSQ team manages it all without relying on IT or the vendor. When regulations change or an internal procedure is updated, the change is implemented that same week.

A Customer Success team that knows your system

Every Prodity customer is assigned a Customer Success team: people who understand your setup, your industry, and your specific situation. Laura Rodríguez, Senior H&S Manager at Zelestra, highlights precisely that in her review: the quality of customer service and the ability to adapt to their needs. Our clients rate our support 5.0 out of 5 on Capterra.

We adhere to the most stringent cybersecurity standards

ISO 27001 for information security management. ISO 27017 for specific protection in cloud environments. ENS Medium Level to comply with the requirements of the Spanish Public Administration and critical services. ISO 9001 to ensure the quality of every update and support process. End-to-end encryption and redundancy protocols that guarantee service continuity regardless of what happens in the digital environment. This is the only set of certifications within the cluster that Zyght does not replicate: four independent, externally audited standards.

Are you comparing several platforms at once?

Zyght isn’t the only platform in this discussion. If your team is evaluating several options before making a decision, here’s a comprehensive analysis of each one: alternatives to Intelex, alternatives to Enablon, alternatives to VelocityEHS, alternatives to Cority, alternatives to Sphera, and alternatives to SafetyCulture.

In every case, we start with the same question: Does the tool fit your operations, or do you have to adapt to it? We’ll show you Prodity with your specific situation laid out on the table—so you can see exactly how it fits before you decide, whether you want to consolidate EHSQ and ESG in one place or because data security is non-negotiable for your organization.

Frequently Asked Questions